111th World Series: New York Mets (NL Champion) vs. Kansas City Royals (AL Champion)
Game 1: Tuesday in Kansas City
Game 2: Wednesday in Kansas City
Game 3: Friday in New York
Game 4: Saturday in New York
Game 5: Sunday in New York (if nec)
Game 6: November 3 in Kansas City (if nec)
Game 7: November 4 in Kansas City (if nec)
All games are at 8:07 pm ET on FOX
This year’s World Series is a bit of a throwback, as the Fall Classic is between two teams trying to win their first title since the mid-1980’s, with the Royals trying to win their first since 1985, and the Mets trying to win their first since 1986. Both franchises are in their second World Series since then, with the Mets losing to the Yankees in 2000, and the Royals losing in seven games to the Giants just last year.
At the same time, this World Series has a very modern feel, as it is the first World Series ever between two expansion franchises, after the Mets were founded in 1962, and the Royals in 1969. In addition, both teams are made up of fairly young rosters (particularly the Mets), adding to the contemporary feel, as the game continues to get younger.
By the accounts of most this series is very even and should be very close, although these teams got here two different ways. The Mets started 49-48, before catching fire on their way to the NL East title, and sweeping the Cubs in the NLCS. The Royals led their division for 164 days, and never trailed by more than one game, but played a closer, six-game ALCS. Here’s a breakdown of who will have the advantage:
The Royals had the worst starting ERA of all 10 postseason teams (4.34), although they did pitch very well in the ALCS. However, the Mets have baseball’s best young rotation, and will send Matt Harvey (13-8, 2.71 ERA) to the mound in Game 1, followed by Jacob deGrom (14-8, 2.54), Noah Snydergaard (9-7, 3.24), and Steven Matz (4-0, 2.27). Collectively the Mets rotation posted a 2.16 ERA in the four games of the NLCS against a good Cubs lineup.
The Mets have a very solid relief unit, sporting a 3.48 relief ERA, led by Jeurys Familia (43 saves, 1.85 ERA). However, they are matched up against a relief corps for Kansas City that has a 2.72 ERA, the second best in baseball, but one I will call the best bullpen in the game. Wade Davis (17 saves, 0.94 ERA) showed his value as the leader of this ‘pen with a strong ALCS performance.
Both of these teams have been hitting well during the postseason, with the Mets averaging 4.8 runs per game in the playoffs, and the Royals averaging 5.7 per contest, and scoring 38 runs in the six games of the ALCS. In the regular season, the Royals had a team batting average 25 points better than the Mets (.269 to .244), and although the Mets’ average is a bit misleading, as they were much better offensively in the second half (.257, after a .233 first half average), there is still an edge for the Royals, even when they can’t use the DH in the games under NL rules in New York.
Advantage: Royals (barely)
On one hand, the Royals fans experienced the World Series last year, while Mets fans haven’t since 2000, and on the other hand, the Royals have four of the seven games at home. But both teams are looking for their first title in at or near 30 years, and Royals fans are hungry to go one step further than last year’s loss in Game 7 of the Fall Classic, and won’t be content with just another AL title.
The Royals experienced the World Series last year, but that’s not solely why I’m giving them the advantage here. Kansas City has trailed in four of their seven postseason wins this year, taking the lead in the seventh or later in three of those wins, in addition to their clutch hitting to take an eighth inning lead in Game 6 of the ALCS (although they never trailed that game). Two of the Mets wins in the NLDS were comeback wins, although they were down earlier in the game, and they never trailed a game against the Cubs in the NLCS. The Royals seem more equipped to win the close games in this series, because they’ve done it throughout this postseason.
Yes, Ned Yost was here with the Royals a year ago, and Terry Collins is in his first postseason, let alone his first World Series, but both of these managers have done superbly with young teams in leading them to get better each year, culminating with the two meeting in the World Series. Giving an edge to one or the other is both unreasonable and unfair.
While the Royals have the advantage in three of these six criteria, and the Mets only do in one, with two even, this series is more even then that would indicate. However, the Royals have been dominant all year, and although this pick is very close, they look more primed to win the series, and trends show they fit the mold of a champion better than the Mets. That being said, because of how strong both teams are, I think this series will go the distance.
The Royals will win the series, four games to three.